Greetings,
Interesting development.
Finally, it has dawned on some politicians that the historically infamous 'cooking exercise' of long ago (and whatever form that may take today), propaganda, hysteria, large crowd gatherings with trumpeting from the platform about issues and potential policies which have no substance, will not a future government make in the 21st century!
The realization has kicked in that one actually needs credible PLANS, and SOLUTIONS, something in the kitty to back it up, and an informed public, in order to make any kind of impact in the daily lives of the electorate.
My, my, my, it is is never too late for a shower of rain, eh?
I wonder how our friends, 'the old timers' over there in their 'Bubble Kingdom' are taking all this? After 50+ years of the same old, same old, these new fandangle ideas must be quite a shock to the system. Bless their hearts!!!
Here is a grand opportunity to break with the past. I wonder how it will turn out?
Anyhow, I say congrats to the brave who have decided to move forward, but as the old saying goes "the proof of the pudding is in the eating".
Peace
Grace
Tuesday 10 March 2015
Monday 2 March 2015
Defending Human Rights: the approach is the key
Greetings,
This post is not directed at any human rights group, organization, or persons who have an interest in human rights. It is not intended to criticize or promote any case. It is about what type of approach, I believe, should be given consideration before defending citizens who have experienced injustice by the State.
The rights of citizens do not exist in a vacuum. Their rights exist within a political, judicial, social, educational, cultural, and economic context. To advocate for, and defend human rights, it is important that it is dealt with objectively, that there is a thorough knowledge of the workings of government, its language, how to communicate with it, and awareness of the possible implications that may arise, if the correct approach is not taken. Diplomacy and tact, is one approach, which should be carefully thought out, prior to dealing with issues on human rights. The interests of the complainant, and all other parties concerned, should not be jeopardized by disrespect, lack of decorum, subjective perspectives, and self-interest.
Choosing the correct approach should be the fundamental principle when defending the rights of the citizen, defending the rights of the citizen within the rule of law, and to encourage public support. An area of particular importance, is the involvement of external organizations when they are invited to support a case, and/or to present findings, in whatever the human rights case may be. That task becomes difficult for them when the original presentation of the case to a government was in an atmosphere of hostility, and contention. No case can achieve the desired result when the approach is inappropriate and negative.
This is not suggesting that the rights of the citizen should not be defended as one thinks fit. On the contrary, one is entitled to their opinion on how to proceed with a matter. However, it is the approach, its implementation, and the effect of it, which is a contributory factor to the outcome.
If human rights is to defend the rights of the people, let the people be the focus, and the approach taken be in their interest. This is more productive than blurring the issues, creating a tussle to score political points, irrelevant posturing, and useless manoeuvring.
Peace
Grace
This post is not directed at any human rights group, organization, or persons who have an interest in human rights. It is not intended to criticize or promote any case. It is about what type of approach, I believe, should be given consideration before defending citizens who have experienced injustice by the State.
The rights of citizens do not exist in a vacuum. Their rights exist within a political, judicial, social, educational, cultural, and economic context. To advocate for, and defend human rights, it is important that it is dealt with objectively, that there is a thorough knowledge of the workings of government, its language, how to communicate with it, and awareness of the possible implications that may arise, if the correct approach is not taken. Diplomacy and tact, is one approach, which should be carefully thought out, prior to dealing with issues on human rights. The interests of the complainant, and all other parties concerned, should not be jeopardized by disrespect, lack of decorum, subjective perspectives, and self-interest.
Choosing the correct approach should be the fundamental principle when defending the rights of the citizen, defending the rights of the citizen within the rule of law, and to encourage public support. An area of particular importance, is the involvement of external organizations when they are invited to support a case, and/or to present findings, in whatever the human rights case may be. That task becomes difficult for them when the original presentation of the case to a government was in an atmosphere of hostility, and contention. No case can achieve the desired result when the approach is inappropriate and negative.
This is not suggesting that the rights of the citizen should not be defended as one thinks fit. On the contrary, one is entitled to their opinion on how to proceed with a matter. However, it is the approach, its implementation, and the effect of it, which is a contributory factor to the outcome.
If human rights is to defend the rights of the people, let the people be the focus, and the approach taken be in their interest. This is more productive than blurring the issues, creating a tussle to score political points, irrelevant posturing, and useless manoeuvring.
Peace
Grace
Monday 29 September 2014
Emotion and trivia versus facts and constructive criticism
Greetings,
On reading a particular Caribbean newspaper, I found it interesting how those who want change to advantage themselves, rather than the nation, are never able to come up with practical suggestions or solutions for the benefit of all. Negative criticism, put down, humiliation, and ridicule, are the order of the day to prove the perceived incompetence of 'them', as opposed to the self ordained enlightened 'us'.
Emotion and trivia can contribute to:
1. heightened blood pressure
2. remaining in a static position.
Could this be the reason why the glass clinkers, and the old guys and gals network cannot get any momentum, so the only thing to do is to blame everybody else for the social and economic conditions?
A veteran from pre-independence times told me about his sightings of the 'happy' happenings on the verandah which was very vocal, and laced with colourful language. According to the veteran, how much of the discussion focused on the national interest was hard to say. However, from his vantage-point of the sidewalk, the voices of the gathering suggested it did not include people like him, or the social class of the masses among its number.
Venting the emotions and exchanging trivia over a glass of Scotch on the Rocks, and other intoxicating beverages available, may have served a purpose where only the privileged could afford to indulge in the expensive liquor. Today that ritual has its limitations. It can take one a short distance only, because, before long, the need for hard facts with supportive evidence, and constructive criticism kicks in, if any attention is to be drawn to issues of concern.
Furthermore, a separatist approach which rides high on a verandah platform, and serves the self-interest of the few, will never be an effective tool for dialogue, to create change, or advance a society. It is counterproductive, unproductive, destructive, and a means to no end. Facts and constructive criticism to encourage productive debate is sacrificed for expediency, and short lived unsustainable policies, with charitable deeds thrown in for good measure.
It appears the message is hard to understand. Old habits die hard. One-upmanship and a separatist mentality will achieve nothing. Even now it has produced zero results.
In my view, the way around this obstacle is to create an environment where everyone can be a part of the conversation that encourages constructive criticism in the national interest, and the presentation of facts that can be understood by all its people.
If we are to share the same space, we need to be on the same page regarding how that space is to be developed and advanced. Cooperation, and a unified force, is the key to progress while we agree to disagree.This is what can make a difference, and move a people, and nation forward.
Whether the reader agrees or disagrees with my position is neither here nor there, but please, I ask you, do not be emotive and trivialize it. Look at the facts, if you can, then criticize constructively at your leisure.
Peace
Grace
On reading a particular Caribbean newspaper, I found it interesting how those who want change to advantage themselves, rather than the nation, are never able to come up with practical suggestions or solutions for the benefit of all. Negative criticism, put down, humiliation, and ridicule, are the order of the day to prove the perceived incompetence of 'them', as opposed to the self ordained enlightened 'us'.
Emotion and trivia can contribute to:
1. heightened blood pressure
2. remaining in a static position.
Could this be the reason why the glass clinkers, and the old guys and gals network cannot get any momentum, so the only thing to do is to blame everybody else for the social and economic conditions?
A veteran from pre-independence times told me about his sightings of the 'happy' happenings on the verandah which was very vocal, and laced with colourful language. According to the veteran, how much of the discussion focused on the national interest was hard to say. However, from his vantage-point of the sidewalk, the voices of the gathering suggested it did not include people like him, or the social class of the masses among its number.
Venting the emotions and exchanging trivia over a glass of Scotch on the Rocks, and other intoxicating beverages available, may have served a purpose where only the privileged could afford to indulge in the expensive liquor. Today that ritual has its limitations. It can take one a short distance only, because, before long, the need for hard facts with supportive evidence, and constructive criticism kicks in, if any attention is to be drawn to issues of concern.
Furthermore, a separatist approach which rides high on a verandah platform, and serves the self-interest of the few, will never be an effective tool for dialogue, to create change, or advance a society. It is counterproductive, unproductive, destructive, and a means to no end. Facts and constructive criticism to encourage productive debate is sacrificed for expediency, and short lived unsustainable policies, with charitable deeds thrown in for good measure.
It appears the message is hard to understand. Old habits die hard. One-upmanship and a separatist mentality will achieve nothing. Even now it has produced zero results.
In my view, the way around this obstacle is to create an environment where everyone can be a part of the conversation that encourages constructive criticism in the national interest, and the presentation of facts that can be understood by all its people.
If we are to share the same space, we need to be on the same page regarding how that space is to be developed and advanced. Cooperation, and a unified force, is the key to progress while we agree to disagree.This is what can make a difference, and move a people, and nation forward.
Whether the reader agrees or disagrees with my position is neither here nor there, but please, I ask you, do not be emotive and trivialize it. Look at the facts, if you can, then criticize constructively at your leisure.
Peace
Grace
Friday 2 May 2014
University is about society
Greetings,
This is an interesting question.
How widespread is racism at uni? - The Guardian, Friday March 14, 2014
Before I went to university I met an undergraduate. I wanted to know what is done to gain the degree, and what university is like. The undergraduate answered the first part of my question. To the second part the response was unexpected - "university is about society".
The students who enter university are from all walks of life, bringing with them their belief systems, prejudices, values, attitudes, norms, and mores. There is no guarantee the higher education experience will bring about a change in behaviour.
Wherever one chooses to have a university education, it is a battleground, just as life is outside of it. Fitting in, is difficult enough. It becomes more difficult when there is racial insensitivity.
So what is the answer to this question?
Take a position.
Forward
Grace
This is an interesting question.
How widespread is racism at uni? - The Guardian, Friday March 14, 2014
Before I went to university I met an undergraduate. I wanted to know what is done to gain the degree, and what university is like. The undergraduate answered the first part of my question. To the second part the response was unexpected - "university is about society".
The students who enter university are from all walks of life, bringing with them their belief systems, prejudices, values, attitudes, norms, and mores. There is no guarantee the higher education experience will bring about a change in behaviour.
Wherever one chooses to have a university education, it is a battleground, just as life is outside of it. Fitting in, is difficult enough. It becomes more difficult when there is racial insensitivity.
So what is the answer to this question?
Take a position.
Forward
Grace
Circles
Greetings,
I understand a Cambridge college at Cambridge University chose a theme for its annual ball namely, "Gone with the Wind".
Cambridge college cancels 'racist' Gone With The Wind themed ball - The Guardian, Wednesday March 19, 2014
This is the title of a 1939 film set in the period of the American Civil War.
For further information click here: "Gone with the Wind"
In my opinion, with some decisions, the thinking that underlies the decision, is more important than the decision itself.
Values, attitudes, norms, and mores help to form one's thinking. Thinking patterns will not change on request.
I believe, if there were no objections, "Gone With The Wind", would have, gone on.
It is very unlikely issues on race will be a thing of the past any time soon.
Hattie McDaniel, an African-American actress in the 1939 film "Gone with the Wind", played the controversial role of Mammy, the very busy, and ever conversant house slave. For her role she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, the first African-American actress to do so. In Hattie McDaniel's time, African-Americans experienced extreme racial stereotyping, racial prejudice, and segregation.
Forward
Grace
I understand a Cambridge college at Cambridge University chose a theme for its annual ball namely, "Gone with the Wind".
Cambridge college cancels 'racist' Gone With The Wind themed ball - The Guardian, Wednesday March 19, 2014
This is the title of a 1939 film set in the period of the American Civil War.
For further information click here: "Gone with the Wind"
In my opinion, with some decisions, the thinking that underlies the decision, is more important than the decision itself.
Values, attitudes, norms, and mores help to form one's thinking. Thinking patterns will not change on request.
I believe, if there were no objections, "Gone With The Wind", would have, gone on.
It is very unlikely issues on race will be a thing of the past any time soon.
Hattie McDaniel, an African-American actress in the 1939 film "Gone with the Wind", played the controversial role of Mammy, the very busy, and ever conversant house slave. For her role she won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, the first African-American actress to do so. In Hattie McDaniel's time, African-Americans experienced extreme racial stereotyping, racial prejudice, and segregation.
Forward
Grace
I, too, support Oxford
Greetings,
The Black and Minority Ethnic students at Oxford University have 'voiced' their experiences.
Oxford's 'students of colour' on being 'othered' at university - The Guardian, Wednesday March 12, 2014.
I have no quarrel with anyone at Oxford. However, I do take exception to the inappropriate questions, comments, and remarks, made to the BME students at the university.
The BME students are under no obligation to justify their presence at Oxford. It is obvious they fulfilled the requirements for entry through the university's normal admissions procedure.
I am in support of the BME students', "I, too, am Oxford " campaign. It is unfortunate the students found it necessary to take this informative approach to raise awareness of their concerns.
Preconceived notions of 'others', avoids seeing what is really there - a human being. It is the preparedness to accept new people, that makes cohesion, cooperation, and respect possible.
Forgive me for coining a passage of scripture, but the truth is, we have been around this 'race' mountain long enough. It is time to change direction, and maximize the positive opportunities, particularly those which come in human vessels, to enrich learning.
I wish all students at the University of Oxford every success.
Forward
Grace
The Black and Minority Ethnic students at Oxford University have 'voiced' their experiences.
Oxford's 'students of colour' on being 'othered' at university - The Guardian, Wednesday March 12, 2014.
I have no quarrel with anyone at Oxford. However, I do take exception to the inappropriate questions, comments, and remarks, made to the BME students at the university.
The BME students are under no obligation to justify their presence at Oxford. It is obvious they fulfilled the requirements for entry through the university's normal admissions procedure.
I am in support of the BME students', "I, too, am Oxford " campaign. It is unfortunate the students found it necessary to take this informative approach to raise awareness of their concerns.
Preconceived notions of 'others', avoids seeing what is really there - a human being. It is the preparedness to accept new people, that makes cohesion, cooperation, and respect possible.
Forgive me for coining a passage of scripture, but the truth is, we have been around this 'race' mountain long enough. It is time to change direction, and maximize the positive opportunities, particularly those which come in human vessels, to enrich learning.
I wish all students at the University of Oxford every success.
Forward
Grace
Saturday 9 November 2013
The Reparations Issue: in simple language
Greetings,
Fourteen Caricom (Caribbean Community) countries in the Caribbean Region have approached Britain, France, and The Netherlands for reparations.
14 Caribbean nations sue Britain, Holland and France for slavery reparations that could cost hundreds of billions of pounds - The Daily Mail, Thursday 10 October, 2013
I am in support of the claim for reparations by the fourteen Caricom countries. I believe, however, that the argument for reparations to compensate for slavery is only part of a bigger issue which is relevant to the position of the Caribbean Region today.
The histories of the islands in the West Indies and the wider Caribbean are unique, so I will not write about the islands of which I am not very familiar. This post is based on what I know about the history of Jamaica from what I have read, learnt about first hand by those who experienced living in colonial Jamaica, and what I have experienced in independent Jamaica to support my position.
I wish to point out that I am not a historian, and will not be using facts and figures unless it is absolutely necessary. I apologize for any errors made.
The Spanish first arrived in Jamaica in 1494. The influence of the Spanish still exists in Jamaica and the Caribbean.
The Spanish were defeated by the British in 1655, then colonized Jamaica which lasted for 307 years.
The reason for colonizing Jamaica was to obtain its natural resources, use its lands for
production, and use its native people for cheap labour in order to develop Britain. This placed Britain in the position to have the best of both worlds at the expense of Jamaica.
There was never any intention to develop Jamaica or use its export/import trading systems for the benefit of the indigenous people. The best ground provisions, citrus fruits, bananas, cattle, lumber, and other natural resources, were shipped off to Britain in no small quantity. What was not wanted for export to Britain was left for the local Jamaican market.
Jamaica was flooded with imports from Britain. The interesting thing was that some of the imports were made with raw materials that originated from Jamaica. The cost of some of the products were usually out of the reach of native Jamaicans.
The Jamaican social structure was based on colour. The black Jamaican majority were, more often than not, limited in terms of advancement up the social ladder. The Indian population were recruited from India to Jamaica as indentured labourers. The Chinese people were 'invited' from Hong Kong to be merchants in Jamaica and to provide provisions for the British, and the Jamaican people. The Middle East population were merchants and involved in various businesses. The mixed race population in Jamaica (termed the mulatto by the British), considered themselves superior to the black majority by virtue of their colour, and was the group of choice of the British colonizers.
Education was available, but was often limited in terms of reaching the high school level (especially the traditional high schools) and beyond, for the black population.
Governance was based on the Westminster model to promote British interests.
The whole infrastructure of Jamaica from the days of slavery, a colony, to independence, was never intended to bring about its economic development . The tragedy of this is that a certain mindset was formed, and seeds sown, in some quarters of Jamaica to maintain the status quo, and to keep Jamaica in perpetual, persistent poverty, and economic struggle. Today, the problem has, and still requires much determination to overcome.
Payment of reparations would only be a start in creating a new history. Repairing the damage of 307 years of exploitation is the task that lies before Jamaica.
The fourteen Caricom countries will be able to relate to the historical journey of Jamaica through their own histories.
The fourteen Caricom countries are not asking Britain, France, and The Netherlands for any favours.
It is what they are owed.
Peace
Grace
PS.
While preparing to write this post, I understand the payment of reparations from Britain is unlikely. In light of this decision, I trust note will be taken of its past history with the Caribbean, as the Caribbean takes note of its history, and its present position.
As we move forward, let us not forget, three hundred and seven years was a very long time.
Note:
Fourteen Caricom (Caribbean Community) countries in the Caribbean Region have approached Britain, France, and The Netherlands for reparations.
14 Caribbean nations sue Britain, Holland and France for slavery reparations that could cost hundreds of billions of pounds - The Daily Mail, Thursday 10 October, 2013
I am in support of the claim for reparations by the fourteen Caricom countries. I believe, however, that the argument for reparations to compensate for slavery is only part of a bigger issue which is relevant to the position of the Caribbean Region today.
The histories of the islands in the West Indies and the wider Caribbean are unique, so I will not write about the islands of which I am not very familiar. This post is based on what I know about the history of Jamaica from what I have read, learnt about first hand by those who experienced living in colonial Jamaica, and what I have experienced in independent Jamaica to support my position.
I wish to point out that I am not a historian, and will not be using facts and figures unless it is absolutely necessary. I apologize for any errors made.
The Spanish first arrived in Jamaica in 1494. The influence of the Spanish still exists in Jamaica and the Caribbean.
The Spanish were defeated by the British in 1655, then colonized Jamaica which lasted for 307 years.
The reason for colonizing Jamaica was to obtain its natural resources, use its lands for
production, and use its native people for cheap labour in order to develop Britain. This placed Britain in the position to have the best of both worlds at the expense of Jamaica.
There was never any intention to develop Jamaica or use its export/import trading systems for the benefit of the indigenous people. The best ground provisions, citrus fruits, bananas, cattle, lumber, and other natural resources, were shipped off to Britain in no small quantity. What was not wanted for export to Britain was left for the local Jamaican market.
Jamaica was flooded with imports from Britain. The interesting thing was that some of the imports were made with raw materials that originated from Jamaica. The cost of some of the products were usually out of the reach of native Jamaicans.
The Jamaican social structure was based on colour. The black Jamaican majority were, more often than not, limited in terms of advancement up the social ladder. The Indian population were recruited from India to Jamaica as indentured labourers. The Chinese people were 'invited' from Hong Kong to be merchants in Jamaica and to provide provisions for the British, and the Jamaican people. The Middle East population were merchants and involved in various businesses. The mixed race population in Jamaica (termed the mulatto by the British), considered themselves superior to the black majority by virtue of their colour, and was the group of choice of the British colonizers.
Education was available, but was often limited in terms of reaching the high school level (especially the traditional high schools) and beyond, for the black population.
Governance was based on the Westminster model to promote British interests.
The whole infrastructure of Jamaica from the days of slavery, a colony, to independence, was never intended to bring about its economic development . The tragedy of this is that a certain mindset was formed, and seeds sown, in some quarters of Jamaica to maintain the status quo, and to keep Jamaica in perpetual, persistent poverty, and economic struggle. Today, the problem has, and still requires much determination to overcome.
Payment of reparations would only be a start in creating a new history. Repairing the damage of 307 years of exploitation is the task that lies before Jamaica.
The fourteen Caricom countries will be able to relate to the historical journey of Jamaica through their own histories.
The fourteen Caricom countries are not asking Britain, France, and The Netherlands for any favours.
It is what they are owed.
Peace
Grace
PS.
While preparing to write this post, I understand the payment of reparations from Britain is unlikely. In light of this decision, I trust note will be taken of its past history with the Caribbean, as the Caribbean takes note of its history, and its present position.
As we move forward, let us not forget, three hundred and seven years was a very long time.
Note:
I have written briefly on a very small part of the history of Jamaica. To learn more I recommend 'The Story of the Jamaican People' by Philip Sherlock and Hazel Bennett (Ian Randle Publishers, Kingston, Jamaica).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)