So, the restitution bit for involvement in Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade is on the up! Give it a rest. WE KNOW you don't really mean it!

Greetings

Well, yet another renowned institution, this time in the world of media, is stepping up to the plate on 'discovering' its link to Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade.

This is supposed to be news? 

It is very commendable that a media house is considering or has considered to give "restorative justice", as it is described, and 'in kind' to parts of The Caribbean, whose ancestors in many respects were slaves. In addition, the objective is to create a more inclusive environment for the underrepresented, in the world of media, within its parameters.

Applause!👏

Now for the laughs.

You mean to tell me with all of the illustrious history of that renowned newspaper, it has just come up that its founder John Edward Taylor, a cotton merchant, during Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade, founded the newspaper with the gains from his lucrative cotton trading business? Furthermore, if it is to be believed, 'research' was needed to uncover that fact?

Oh please!

I can now fully understand and appreciate, most sincerely, why the field of journalism in the U.K. has been, and still is, a very exclusive career path to follow, if one is not a member of its indigenous society.  

Let's view this from a rational standpoint. Would you want 'outsiders' to know what the financial foundation of your business is all about? Especially when its finances were originally gained from the exploitation, and trading, of 'their' ancestors?

From what I have read, the investment, and the period over which it will extend, is very impressive, but for how long that commitment will hold in the future is anybody's guess. The way I see it, it is not a question of a 'willingness' to right a wrong, as that in itself is an impossible task, but rather to avoid anyone else finding out ahead of it which could well have resulted in the renowned newspaper being caught with its pants down!

Please note, this is not an impolite dig at that newspaper, which I deeply respect, as well as being a subscriber to its online website, (and hopefully I will not be banned from it after writing and publishing this post). However, it is VERY wearisome to read of ALL these fake and insincere apologies, bordering on the edge of the condemnation of slavery, to make up for past events, when in fact the U.K., today, where the indigenous home folk are concerned, they could not give a hoot about it!

The truth of the matter is Great Britain owes its financial, industrial, overall economic success and development to the financial benefits of The Transatlantic Slave Trade. Many British slave owners, according to British history, were VERY disappointed when it all ended, hence their need to be compensated. I have no doubt the slave owners saw the active abolitionists who fervently opposed Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade in its entirety, as their enemies. Nevertheless, the abolitionists eventually succeeded in their endeavours. One of those abolitionists was William Wilberforce. 

I will NEVER be impressed with Britain's weak attempts to acknowledge the part it played in supporting Slavery, and enrichment gained from The Transatlantic Slave Trade. Its gestures in kind amount to coppers in a tin, in comparison to the astronomical gains it had made over many centuries at the expense of my ancestors, as well as the ancestors of my fellow Black British Caribbeans, the ancestors of ethnic minorities in Britain not mentioned here, and never mind our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. 

What is much, much more important to me than the constant apologising farce, and the pretentious descriptive abhorrence of slavery, is the civilising of Britain's behaviour towards people who have the same melanin as me, whether they be very light, light, dark, or very dark in complexion, and whose customs are not familiar to it. Has it ever dawned on Britain that if you treat people who do not look like you, in terms of the predominant colour, in a civilised, and respectful manner, one might just get the same in return? 

It is quite clear to me, a Nation is comfortable with the fact that it once ruled at least 90 per cent of the earth's surface, subjected the people of those colonised nations (which included the United States in the past), in order to steal what belongs to those nations by creating laws to effect the legality of its action. What it did not expect was to see the descendants of slaves of colonised or former colonised territories migrate to The Motherland, (please note that they were invited by either The Government of the day, and/or other entities), and compete with the indigenous population in its own space. As a result, it is hardly surprising that the very negative, entrenched, and endemic racist behaviour of that Nation is what it is to this day.

The Windrush Generation is very familiar with all of what I am saying here, but were also master, to a large extent, of giving back to their former coloniser much diplomatic flack, with class, and accompanied by a pleasant smile, while on British turf, when faced with racist opposition. Their diplomatic, non- violent psychology more often than not said: 

Do not mess with us. We are not messing with you. We did not come to Britain to beg from you, nor interfere with your way of life, but only to work and build our lives. We know about Britain already from our experiences with it as the colonial ruler in our respective countries. Its people and administration could walk over some of us, and treat us anyway it wished, but do not try it with some of us here regardless of the fact that Britain belongs to you. We are immigrants, but we are not your doormat. Your colour is not an issue to us, as our colour is to you. You treat us with respect and that respect will be returned. 

This position ran through my family as it did with many families led by Windrush Generation parents. Where my parents were concerned, the fact that I was born and raised in England was irrelevant, as they were well aware that the negative mindset of Britain as a whole towards them as immigrants, would be extended to me. Therefore, they saw to it that I was made fully aware of my position in England, and went about the business of ensuring that I understood who I am as a descendant of Jamaican stock, and be fully aware of Jamaican culture, customs and its indigenous Jamaican Creole language. More importantly, in their view, and according to their recall of colonial Jamaica, was my standard of speech, the use of the English Language, knowledge of British culture, customs, way of life, and that I should respect the United Kingdom at all times. However, my parents made it absolutely clear to me, that all of me did not belong to England nor to any other aspect of the United Kingdom, as the behaviour of Britain will treat me no differently to them when they  lived on their island home of Jamaica under British colonial rule.

The success and contribution by The Windrush Generation to Britain's economic advancement since the 1950's and 1960's, was more than any compensation Britain could now give to the Caribbean Region, never mind to compensate for Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade which affected The West Indies. If there is doubt regarding the authenticity of my argument, compare the proposed 'restorative justice' to the 'financial justice' paid out to the slave owners at the expense of the slave descendants, through taxation, I believe, and paid it all back with interest, I imagine, when the books were balanced in 2015. I do not have a problem being corrected here. Life is for learning. 

This so-called new and revealing research, is not new. It has only been forced out into the open due to the unexpected Black Lives Matter Movement in protest at the death of George Floyd at the hands of U.S. Law enforcement. 

What is being asked for by all descendants of slaves who have free will (as there are those who wish that free will, in that context, did not exist at all), is to be treated as human beings, to be respected, as a people, to be well educated, and be given a chance to be successful in life by simply being a human being. The wish is to be entitled to the right to life and well being, together with their culture and traditions, in harmony with, respect for, and to make a valuable contribution to Britain in whichever area is chosen. Britain is not asked to grant ANY favours, and to have that expectation may well be considered an insult.

Where will Britain lose with such an approach?

Remember, without Slavery, The Transatlantic Slave Trade, the slave ancestors on the plantations, and wherever else, Britain would have nothing.

To regard people of colour as inferior when compared to the indigenous members of Britain, but who can make, and have made, an excellent contribution to Britain's economic advancement, is to make one look a total fool. I understand there are still plenty of them going around in the U.K. today. Times have hardly changed, if any at all. 

Dishing out honours to people of colour to beef up this so called inclusion, and diversity charade, will not change attitudes. It is the intrinsic, entrenched superiority complex, mindset and attitudes towards people of colour that, consciously, needs to change - if it wants to. Then again, I would not hold my breath on that happening.

I understand that Britain has its own slavery type history in the abuse of its own people historically, based on prejudice towards the lower social class, and the use of child labour. This aspect of Britain's history is not new to me, but it pales into insignificance when compared to the enduring and entrenched social and racial prejudice shown towards people of colour over many centuries. 

Oh yes, and before you start, it is highly possible that people of colour were selling slaves who were people of colour too. I will not dispute that. There will always be those who will be 'blindfolded' and 'encouraged' to 'sell-out' their own.  A highly controversial report published not too long ago proved that.

I am not undermining any aspect of British history. That is not my objective here.  If a reader of this post can point out to me where non-black slaves were packed into a ship like sardines in a tin, defecating, urinating and whatever else right where they were during the transatlantic crossing known as The Middle Passage, sick and dying, then eventually chucked overboard when found dead, as a dead slave can bring no profit, I believe I would be in a better position to determine whether the so- called new found research can create any real heartfelt type of change towards race and its implications in the U.K. Right now, I see the elaborate project embarked upon by the renowned newspaper as a publicity stunt with a ticket to nowhere.

It is unfortunate, but the thinking of the past is extended today from - a dead black slave can bring no profit, to, a dead black 'slave' must make no profit to benefit him/herself. Highly controversial statements.  Nevertheless, the high proportion of black lives lost in those countries which made its wealth on the backs of the slave ancestors of the black race, gives some credence to the statements. This mentality still exists within Britain, and in the mindset of its fellow European and North American friends, all of whom have a history of benefitting enormously, to this present day, from its historical involvement in Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade. 

Finally, (which will, no doubt, be a relief  to many), it needs to be understood that positive racial and social attitudes are much more important than: 

throwing money down to compensate for, and to put out of sight and out of mind, Britain's slave trade history, 

producing reams of research which will change nothing, and its source will go no further than where it has been sitting quite comfortably for a century or more, 

and,

creating spaces for the underrepresented who may still find themselves subject to inherent racist behaviour in a different form and fashion, as well as the everlasting race relations issues.

If the above is taken into consideration, and it is decided upon that respect for all, and by all, is the way forward regardless of colour, creed or culture, in the interest of all, at the end of the day it may be quite a surprise to find, that hostile attitudes to persistent racism, and negative social/racial behaviour in Britain, on both sides, may change.

You never know.

Anyway, l'll be a good sport, and not put any more of a damper on the effort by the renowned newspaper. I am looking forward to reading the research, the content of which, I believe, will not be new information to us descendants of slaves, with free will, in the slightest.

Let's wait and see how all this business will turn out.

Be good

Blessings and Peace

Grace

The Sovereign has passed. History Remains.

 First.

I wish to offer my condolences to The Royal Family, on the passing of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

I also wish to offer my condolences to The United Kingdom, and its people, on the passing of Her Majesty.

My Post 

In the media it has been reported about the differing reactions of members of the public, within, and outside of the United Kingdom, and at times in startling ways, on the passing of The Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II.

There have been expressions of heartfelt comments with negative connotations. That is not for me to judge, as only those persons know of the injustices and atrocities done to their people in the name of The Crown and The British Empire. Therefore, for them, empathy, and the sense of loss is not shared.

This may well be interpreted as support in their corner, but the reality is inspite of death - history remains.

It is a history that takes front position and raises anger in who is seen as a figurehead and representation of those horrors of the past, and of which the present chooses to ignore.

It is felt by many in the public domain that this is not the time for recriminations, which is true. However, history has a way of kicking in when someone's passing reminds people of acts long gone and considered no longer important to some,  but to others it is a matter of justice denied, with no one taking responsibility nor accountability for those actions.

The passing of Her Majesty reminds many of her subjects in what is now known as The Commonwealth, of the brutal acts, injustice, exploitation, merciless suppression of rebellion, and murder, committed against its native people, and the forced acquisition of their land, be it in The Caribbean, The African Continent, The Indian subcontinent, Australasia, and wherever else, in the name of The Crown, and The British Empire.

Unpleasant it is to acknowledge.

However, memories linger in those who are still alive to remember atrocities carried out against their people, and their descendants to whom their history has been passed and stand in solidarity with the survivors, or keep in mind those who are no longer with us to seek justice for themselves.

Islands within The Caribbean, states within the African Continent, The Indian subcontinent, and the native Aborigine People of Australia are still grappling with the aftermath of the large-scale  plunder of their land,  slaughter of their people who dared to defy the Colonial power, and leaving their respective islands, countries, communities, and people, stripped of its wealth, and economy. Furthermore, the struggle to nationhood had in many ways created a divided nation, resulting in past war and conflict initially instigated by the Colonial philosophy of divide and rule. My parents island home, Jamaica, was no exception to Britain's exploitation prowess, as it colonised, enslaved, put down rebellions, while benefitting from its free labour, minimum paid labour, land, and natural resources for 307 years.

The depth of feeling across The Commonwealth is magnified by the past historical relationship between the respective State, Island or Continent, with Britain, and therefore determines the overall reaction to Her Majesty's passing. 

It is my view that a considerable portion of The Commonwealth does not wish to see nor participate in a British Empire 2.0 (The Commonwealth) with the 'younger' generation, and dare I say, those without a ounce of Royal Blood, taking their seat to 'reign' over it. The plan to have added 'tone' to make The Commonwealth more appealing, and to keep Britain and The Commonwealth together, is a lost cause. That 'togetherness' between Britain and The Commonwealth is long gone.

It is clear The Commonwealth will not relent in its cry for Reparations, and justice, where justice is due.

Until then, there are those who will choose to mourn the passing of Her Majesty, and there are those who will not.

In the midst of it all, I wish to remember Her Majesty as Sovereign, a mother, a grandmother, a great-grandmother, who pledged to serve her people, her country, and The Commonwealth, throughout her life. That, Her Majesty did, while placing her trust in The Almighty.

I also believe that trust will absolve Her Majesty of many acts that were committed in The name of The Crown, by others, who are truly accountable.

There is only One, who knows all.

History remains. 

It needs to be told.

Farewell Your Majesty.

May the blessing of God Almighty be upon Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, and may He cause His face to shine upon her, and give her peace, now and always.

Amen.

Grace

The shackled Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The irrelevant Report (and other matters)

Greetings,

The reader is asked to note that some assertions in this post may be of concern. Nevertheless, such assertions need to be brought to the fore. Please read with an open mind.

The brainchild behind the initiative for the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, and the compilation of The Report, should be commended. It proves that a new form and fashion can be used to produce the same useless rhetoric, to come to the same useless conclusion, to ensure the cry for equality is addressed into oblivion, and the status quo remains the same.

In the name of common sense, was more than this expected?

The composition of the Commission (this is no disrespect to The Chair, and the ladies and gentlemen of the Commission), reminds me of what I learnt from my parents about the effective, and proven colonial principle of  divide and rule, with backra in the background. It also brings to mind the novel titled, Uncle Tom's Cabin, 21st century style, under camouflage.

Anyway, moving on.

The revolving door on race was built to last. It is akin to being built with bricks and mortar with the intent for it to last for centuries.  Many buildings within the Caribbean Region are a testament to that form of construction. I believe the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report, has, inadvertently, maintained that continuum with little effort.

On reading the 'masterpiece', the words of Mr. Linton Kwesi Johnson is the only sensible aspect referred to, and sums up beautifully what the Commission has failed to see. According to The Report, Mr Linton Kwesi Johnson was described as saying the first phase or era of the Black presence in the U.K. was the "heroic period" - The Windrush Generation. In my own words, the sheer backbone, stubborn resistance, and steadfast psychological warfare, mete out on the indigenous population by The Windrush Generation, who were aware that their presence in England was objected to, resulted in their success, and victory, that can never be erased by Britain. The terms 'race' and 'ethnic disparities' were not commonly used back in their day, but they had substantial knowledge of their colonial rulers from their experiences of colonial rule in The West Indies, and knew the playing field was certainly not level. It was this knowledge that enabled them to succeed in Britain despite the inequalities, and disparities, that existed during the early days of their arrival, and in the years to follow.

 They also knew that, for their children, born in the U.K., or not, the economic and social structure of Britain  would become more difficult for them to navigate, and negotiate, but tried their best to prepare them for the many challenges ahead. It is my very strong belief that if their descendants intend to remain in England, or the wider U.K., they will have to be prepared to take up, what I describe as 'The Blueprint', 'drafted' by The Windrush Generation to ensure, come hell or high water, that their success, interests, and that of future generations, come to fruition, in a constructive and positive manner, while living in a divided society. To put it in simpler terms - don't waste time arguing and discussing the issue of race over and over and expect agreement and unity on it. The effort makes no sense in the presence of the 'deaf' listeners. There is greater benefit, and productivity, in moving forward regardless of the odds. The reader does not need me to tell of the positive outcome that yielded for The Windrush Generation.

Furthermore, The Windrush Generation knew that in reality, and in relation to the psychological mind games and mindset that surrounded them, and of which they could 'read' very easily according to the behaviour exhibited, there was no difference in thinking towards the Black British Caribbean born person versus the Black British, British born person, who were, and are, categorised as the same. The British part is a mere technicality regardless of the propaganda.

No report, whatever it is intended to achieve, will never be able to repair the undermining, and exclusion, be it direct or indirect, that has been brought to bear on ethnic minority communities in the U.K., over many decades.

 A little history.

The HMT Empire Windrush arrived in England in 1948 after World War Two ended in 1945. As I understand it from my parents, the invitation went out to the West Indies from the British Government of the day back then, and was announced  by local radio stations, and printed in the local newspaper on each respective West Indian island under Crown Colony. The Invitation, invited, West Indians to go to Britain to assist in the rebuilding of Britain from "the ravages of the war". I must add here that I also learnt from my parents how mystified they were on realising how oblivious the English citizenry was to the reason why West Indians had arrived in Britain, and who were often left speechless on learning from  the West Indians why they were there. From what I have read, there was a call by some in the British Government at that time to divert the ship 'elsewhere'. Apparently, the late Sir Winston Churchill was none too happy at the prospect of a ship load of "coloured people" arriving on Britain's doorstep to the consternation of the British public. The call did not prevail, and the ship maintained course for England.

The reader may find the piece below an interesting read:

The Guardian

Observer special report

'Windrush: archived documents show the long betrayal'

by David Olusoga

Fast forward.

Over the last 60+ years since the arrival of The HMT Empire Windrush at Tilbury docks (Port of Tilbury), England, with West Indians from the British West Indies Crown Colonies on board, it was never intended for immigrants from the former colonies, be it the West Indies, the Indian sub-continent, nor their descendants, to be accepted as equals, never mind to be well educated, to advance, and be successful. What needs to be noted here is the unique quality of the West Indian immigrants of that era, and also immigrants from the Indian subcontinent who were not averse to work, as belittling as the nature of the work then was, in many respects. They would make do with whatever work was available until better came along, as each  experience was seen as a step closer to one's dream(s), and not only their success, but sustained success in England over many years.

The unexpected progress of immigrants to Britain, particularly those from the West Indies, has totally reversed the objective of allowing them in. The varied experiences of the road to success by The Windrush Generation, their descendants, and other members of ethnic minority communities inspite of the many obstacles and pitfalls placed in their way, and racist tendencies shown towards them, speaks for itself. Britain needs to face the origins of its race relations dilemma, be it overt or covert, as the problem still exists today, intrinsically, to quite some extent, and, who knows, may well forever exist, in all its glory. This is my take on it:

If possible, keep immigrants out. If they are allowed in, put them under subjection, so that they must not achieve anything and challenge the indigenous population. If they do get, and achieve anything from us, they should be grateful, and kept at a distance. Then they should learn our ways, and do as we do, and not disturb our way of life.

This philosophy has not changed one jot. It is the containment of it that makes it appear that progress has been made on race, and race relations in Britain.  To suggest that racism is no longer the leading factor behind ethnic disparities in the U.K., is a well rehearsed lie, and a very effective one too.  Interestingly, the philosophy is no different to that of the U.S.A.  It is just a matter of that country going about the business of race in a different way that has a horrendous history, and although the intense racism is not as it was when the Civil Rights Movement took centre stage in the 1960's, the race issue is still ongoing. The Black Lives Matter Movement which began in the U.S.A., has been in the making for a very long time, in light of the high loss of life of African-Americans through their encounter with, and at the hands of U.S. law enforcement. It is not an impromptu idea brought to the fore on impulse by enthusiastic young people bent on seeking racial and social justice. I would go further and say the U.K., and the U.S.A., share a common mindset on race hidden behind hypocrisy. Remember that money spinner called The Transatlantic Slave Trade? There is no room for self-righteousness on race in the U.K., or elsewhere.

The constant determination and belief of ethnic minority communities that they should fulfil their potential, provides fuel for their detractors together with continual strife and hostility. No real, genuine progress, will ever be made on race and ethnic disparities in Britain, until it faces its true position, which is in fact its opposition to immigration, ethnic  minorities, and anything else that disrupts the continuity of the indigenous population.  This includes support of the undertone of the silent anti-immigrant fervour which pervades Britain. These positions need to be brought to the surface - not the far right only - as that leaning is a scapegoat, and sacrificial lamb, to cover the by and large natural racist tendency that exists. However, be reminded, where immigration is concerned, that there are always exceptions, especially if the ethnic minority group is financially viable.

Historically, race, and ethnic disparities are not new concepts. The concepts are entrenched in the mindset from the days of The Glorious British Empire, administration of the Crown Colonies, through its successive generations, to this present day. I recall my father telling me of the substantial difference in pay between the British colonisers, and Jamaican natives, black Jamaicans in particular, on the island of Jamaica during Crown Colony prior to, and during the 1950's. Having a fearless disposition towards the colonial ruling power, my father who was working as a civilian employee, confronted his employer, an officer, Major, in rank, in The British Army of Her Majesty's Armed Forces, stationed at Up Park Camp, Kingston, Jamaica. He said he raised the issue with the Major to express his concern, in a respectful, and diplomatic manner. He said that it is unfair for one to be earning £5.00 per week, and the other 5 shillings per week, and the lesser cannot purchase one pound of Beef going at 5 shillings per pound from the Chinese grocery store. According to my father, the Major tried to sidestep the issue with a wry smile, and a flippant remark, and said in a subdued colonial tone, "Not everyone can be rich, Sydney". My father replied promptly, and said, "I am not talking about riches, Major, I am talking about survival." 

In the 21st century, SURVIVAL, is still the cry of immigrants, and is still at the heart of every ethnic minority community member in Britain today, be they rich, not so rich, or poor.

It is true there are ethnic minority groups that have been exceedingly successful in education, commerce, politics, sports, music, performing arts etc. However, they too have had their fair share of  negotiating obstacles, direct and indirect unfavourable comments, slight, and awkward situations. They too have had to rise above the mess of racism, and have unexpectedly, become assets that Britain cannot afford to lose. This does not mean that successful ethnic minorities are accepted, never mind treated as equals, but the mainland is forced to endure their presence either through necessity, or convenience.

There is no such thing as "Open Britain", nor an "open society", or even attempting to achieve it, unless there is a change in the mindset on race. To think Britain is partially there, but can achieve it over the long term with practical action, is wishful thinking and a fallacy. It has been 30 years since I left Britain, and kept myself informed of happenings there. On the issue of race, I have neither seen, read, nor heard, one scrap of evidence to suggest that there has been any major, or even significant and effective movement to create real change on race relations in Britain, outside of the statute on Race Relations. Please note, the ethnic minority token placement here and there for appearances in various strata of society, and the awarding of titles and other honours does not mean there is - CHANGE. This is not 'race baiting', as some would love to say, it is a hard cold fact.

An interesting comment in the Foreword from The Chair stated, "Creating a multicultural society is hard, and racial disparities exist wherever such a society is being forged." I say, true, especially when the multicultural society is not what Britain relishes at all. The comment goes on, "The Commission believes that if these recommendations..." (in The Report), "...are implemented it will give a further burst of momentum to the story of our country's progress to a successful multicultural community - a beacon to the rest of Europe and the world."

Brave words, "...a beacon...". I can envision Europe laughing as it recalls the Scramble for Africa of which Britain was a part, and its behaviour not much different to that of The European countries with colonies on the African Continent at that time. There was also the business of Britain's dominance of at least 90 per cent of the earth's surface as an Imperial power. This mindset still exists, and has been passed on to each new indigenous generation. The new name for The British Empire is now The Commonwealth. Nice. Sounds less controversial, but history still remains. My parents, and the parents of The Chair of The Commission I understand, are from respectively, one of several islands in The West Indies that was under British Colonial Rule in their day. As their children, we cannot distance ourselves from their past. Opportunity to Chair The Commission does not erase nor lessen the impact of history. As for the rest of the world, their history books will tell their connection with Britain be it as a colony, former colony, protectorate, or whatever else.  One needs to consider carefully the choicue of words when making a comment on such a very sensitive issue.

Let us not forget that Britain's icon, politician and statesman the late Cecil John Rhodes, former 7th Prime Minister of the Cape Colony, is still honoured and revered for his exploits in the Southern African Cape Colony and his unfailing belief in British Imperialism. There was also the establishment of the former Rhodesia, by the late Ceil Rhodes. The late Ian Smith was the eighth Prime Minister of Rhodesia, which, since its transition to black majority rule, has reverted to its original name, Zimbabwe. Both statesmen were unswerving in their position to maintain the system of Apartheid, while exploiting the rich resources of South Africa, and the former Rhodesia, to the detriment of the indigenous black African people. In so doing they received no small support from The British Establishment. Even now in its quiet quarters, the belief system of those esteemed late statesmen is still upheld, behind its anti-apartheid veneer. 

Furthermore, it is known that the pitiful, and insincere 'sorry' and 'apologies' regarding the Transatlantic Slave Trade, and Colonialism, will do absolutely nothing to appease the black community, and ethnic minorities in general. It is blatantly obvious that neither society, nor the powers that be of today is genuinely sorry at all about any of it, as it is believed the post slave trade, and post colonialism generations has nothing to do with the activities of past generations of that era, since the fall of The Empire.

However, presuming that is the position on the issue, and giving the benefit of the doubt, what about persistent racial and social attitudes which stem from, again, the mindset of that time past, which has continued through generations, and is still being exercised with rigour be it direct, indirect, or hidden?

What is to be done about that, if anything at all?

One can change their perception of someone, something, or a group of people if one chooses to do so. This is where the depth of the problem lies. The refusal to acknowledge, and accept people based on their colour, race, and behaviours, as it is alien to what one believes should be the status quo on its own turf.

In my personal opinion, embarking on a difficult discussion on the matter of race is an exercise in futility, as the mindset is not minded to change. 

With that said, I acknowledge those persons who are not members of any ethnic minority group and oppose any form of racism and discrimination. However, they know just as I do, that it is difficult for them to truly understand the offensiveness of racism no matter what form it takes - unless one experiences it fully in reverse.

This is why I support the position taken by The Windrush Generation during their sojourn or lifetime, and heyday in the U.K.  That Generation chose to sidestep, and ignore the noise of persistent racism, and instead, continually and consistently, raised the level and standard in all they did, while pressing forward to realise their dreams regardless of the umbrage it would cause. It is because of that wise move taken by The Windrush Generation that I am not impressed by this 'inclusion' farce, as my people have always considered themselves included. It is society that has taken the initiative, past and present, to 'exclude' my people wherever and whenever it suited them, as well as give them the everlasting run around. Now, suddenly, because of the Black Lives Matter Movement protests, the pretentious, fake, and on the borderline of segregation and separatism incognito, the term 'inclusion', is popping up to support the notion that Britain is not racist nor does racism exist! The best part of it, is the choice of Chair of the Commission, and those chosen to comprise the Commission, to prove, with the aid of The Report - that is a (supposed) fact!

Who is trying to fool who here?

We have been here before, and interestingly enough, such transparent, and false, unifying action, is still ongoing!

The "darkies", " coons", "blackies", "nig-nogs", and other terms besides, (take your pick), are not fools on the matter, but one is a fool to think that they are.

How does the Chair expect Britain to forge a multicultural society with its mindset steadfastly forged in its supremacy focused, exploitive, and self-righteous stance on the British Empire, which still regards its immigrants of former colonies as subjects, whose countries are still seen as under colonial dominance - as well as their children, born in Britain or not, as irrelevant? 

This is their entitlement, and their right, it is believed, divinely given or not, to treat non-white folk (like me) as inferior, and we are to accept it whether we like it or not. The Windrush Generation had another view, which in effect, said, they can go_________ with it, as what was obtained during the glory days of The British Empire were stolen goods, taken by force through subjugation of the colonised native people, 'claimed' in the name of The Crown, and supported by 'to suit themselves laws' in order to give the colonisers actions and activities the appearance of legality. Unknown to non-black persons in the U.K., The Windrush Generation, regardless of which island or country each member is from, and ethnic minority groups that migrated to Britain from former colonies of The British Empire, were, and are, certainly no fools, regarding knowledge of Britain's barefaced rule, theft, and unjust treatment of West Indian people, and of other ethnic minority groups in their own native country, or on their respective islands over centuries.

Again, this is why I fully support all ethnic minorities, and anybody else who is interested, in learning about British and English history together with African and Caribbean history, and furthermore Asian history, as many of Britain's cherished churches, cathedrals, museums, stately homes, long established government buildings, to name a few, were built with the financial resources gained from The Transatlantic Slave Trade, and Colonisation, be it directly or indirectly. Those financial resources did not include deductions for wages, never mind a salary, sickness benefit, annual leave, nor furnished accommodations to our overworked and unpaid slave ancestors, and ancestors used as servants. Therefore, it is my view, that my people, and ethnic minorities in general, should feel a sense of belonging, and respect for such buildings together with what is contained in them. I strongly encourage my people to take the opportunity to visit some of these buildings that are accessible to the public, as our slave ancestors, and servants, played more than a large part with their unrewarded labour, in enabling those buildings to be in existence at all.

I am cognisant of those who will not share my position, as it goes against the concept of maintaining the supremacy and  exclusiveness of Empire. 

I believe the mindset, and thinking, on the 'renewal of Empire', was a leading factor in gaining much public support to leave the EU. That, my friends, I will leave right where it is.

It is intriguing, considering the composition of the Commission, that it appears no conflict has arisen in making certain statements in the Report, which run contrary to the ethnic minority experience in the U.K. Maybe the Commission could shed some light on this.

It appears that the concept of 'divide and rule', in terms of the tone, and leaning of The Report, is in full swing.

Next.

Whatever upward mobility in terms of employment, promotion, etc., that has been achieved by ethnic minorities has been 'fought for' by gaining high academic qualification, and/or high specialisation skills, and achieved with sheer determination. The doors of opportunity have not been opened willingly, but grudgingly, and not fully opened either.

Including, and looking into problems among disadvantaged indigenous members of the population, is understandable. However, it tends to mask the seriousness of race, ethnic disparities, and racism itself, as the predominant issues, in order to create a diversion. It is an affront to suggest, that racism is no longer the basis, in all cases, as the cause of educational disadvantage, while diverting the argument to other probable causes - "geography, family influence, socio-economic background, culture, and religion..." as stated in The Report. The Report goes on to say that the above "has more significant impact on life chances than the existence of racism."

I challenge that position.

It is those same factors which can be the drivers to propel, and encourage, educational advancement. To break the cycle of socio-economic disadvantage in terms of housing, health, social mobility, as well as prove that one's religion and culture is no hindrance to success. It is when geography, family influence, socio-economic background, culture, and religion, are coupled with racism, and social class prejudice, that the 'fight' to advance becomes more difficult, and the determination to defeat it gains momentum. Some ethnic minorities that have suffered educational underachievement more than most, is not because they are not capable, but what is always denied historically, together with a long established mindset, is that some ethnic minorities, particularly from the Caribbean or of Caribbean descent, are not entitled to, or to put it more crudely, they should not receive an education to be effective, and, or the preferred choice, is that they should not receive any at all. History of education in Jamaica, in particular, during Crown Colony, limited education for its indigenous people restricting them to low paid domestic work, or limited self-employment, (only the 'favoured' few by virtue of 'shade' or 'recommendation' in terms of colonial acceptance, gained the opportunity to scale higher heights in education), while stratifying other non-black ethnic groups to receive educational advantages, which set the stage for further educational opportunities, business creation, and professional employment. I cannot speak for other ethnic minorities in Britain, but where Caribbean people are concerned, West Indians, to be precise, history has created an excuse to believe we are only fit for slave labour, or cheap labour, the latter of which The Windrush Generation know of only too well.  This, and the aforementioned, I have absolutely no doubt, the esteem Chair of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities has full knowledge of as a descendant of Windrush Generation members. 

It has taken much for my people - Black British born/Black British Caribbean born people - to fight back to prove we are neither intellectually deficient, nor educationally subnormal, in order to defend ourselves from that long and  historical perception. Also, it is the long standing belief of the supposed intellectual ineptitude of black people in general, and the superiority mindset to ethnic minorities in particular, that has built the unshakeable confidence that -

"the darkies" will never twig our true mindset towards them

 - that is, Britain will never desist from its racist, and anti-immigrant position, be it passive or vocal.

The persistent mindset on race and racism, and ethnic disparities is alive, well, and in good health in Britain today, no matter how subtle in action, denied publicly, and tokenised.  It is still one root of many in Britain's race relations, and will continue to be its strength, and impediment, until Britain decides - if it wants to - change course. There is no guarantee.

 Returning to The Report.

 

I am not questioning the data from The Government Database which provided evidence on race and ethnic disparities for the Commission to utilise. I am questioning the efficacy of it. To what extent does it really relate to realities on the ground? Was there an attempt to collect qualitative data from a representative sample to support the quantitative statistical data in the Government Database to obtain a clear picture of what is really happening in terms of race and ethnic disparities in the so-called "open society" in "Open Britain"?

Or was it a case of expediency with the Commission in the thick of it, and the potential of The Report to backfire?

This is not an attack on Her Majesty's Government, nor on the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities. It is the methodology of approach, and the conclusion drawn, that gives cause for concern.

The methodology, and conclusion, of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report, may need further consideration, and may need to be tested further - qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition there is the possibility of using focus groups across the U.K. to ascertain the true public feeling and sensitivity on race and ethnic disparities, as reactions to The Report is very telling.

The revolving door has been set in motion once again. I believe this is no accident.

I respect The Chair, and the Commission, after all that has been said, as I truly feel the intention was to compile the best report it could. My personal feeling, is that, on a whole, in light of the Black Lives Matter Movement, the Commission may have been blindsided, and unfortunately, did not see it coming.

Before I close, I wish to inform the indigenous population, respectfully, especially the young indigenous population, of a certain story that may not have been told to them correctly by their elders, or by those in governance. All of whom tend to have 'amnesia' at some point, for convenience, on sensitive race issues.

Please pay close attention.

The immigrants from the British Empire, particularly those from The West Indies, and The Indian subcontinent, prior to Independence agreements, and contrary to popular belief, did not choose to go to Britain to change its way of life, to reorganise it, to take it over, to colour it up, to discombobulate its sacred institutions, to desecrate its statues, nor bring down The British Establishment. 

They went to Britain by invitation of The British Government of the day, no less, with the ambition to improve their lives through hard work and sacrifice, and contribute to the continued development of Britain. This was their objective and passion, inspite of the participation of Britain in The Transatlantic Slave Trade, the exploitation of their respective island home, or country as a Crown Colony of Britain, and injustices endured there under the administration of British Colonial Rule.

I will pause here, to give the reader the opportunity to absorb that information.

Oh, by the way, I think this is where the late Mr. Enoch Powell got it wrong with his "Rivers of  Blood" speech, but he meant well, and held firm to his point of view. I hold no grudge against the gentleman. Bless him.

The contentious opposition to the immigrants on their arrival, and in spite of rigorous attempts by Windrush Generation parents to pass on to their young Caribbean born or British born children strong Caribbean values and attitudes, the importance of a good education, educational advancement, and a strong work ethic to help forge their success, the young ones too faced even more hostility resulting in, as Mr. Linton Kwesi Johnson put it, the 'rebel generation', of which, I am one. The causes of that 'rebel generation' legacy needs to be erased, in order for future ethnic minority generations to thrive in Britain, and contribute to its economic well-being.

What binds the stronghold of race and ethnic disparities, is the mindset. The ingrained belief that the former subjects of The British Empire, and dare I say, even their children born in Britain, as well as ethnic minority communities in general, are seen as subjects of a lesser kind, unimportant, and treated with scant regard without a second thought. The mindset is no different to the days of The Slave Trade, and the glory of The British Empire - that is the slave owner, and the colonial ruler mentality, respectively, is very much at the forefront, and entrenched in Britain regardless of how many generations have passed. Until that mindset is changed, if ever, the frills and fancy to create the illusion that race relations is moving forward in Britain, is not in the interests of ethnic minorities at all. The objective, as always, is to sweep it under the carpet, as it is believed the non-white races can be conned with a gift and a smile, as the concept of the "piccaninnies with water melon smiles", describes, and, I might add, that is a very real perception and considered normal behaviour in the minds of some in relation to a particular ethnic group, be they  children referred to, or extended to adults. With that concept in mind, all will be well, with no need to change, and the status quo remains the same. It is unfortunate that such a mindset exists, but it is so.

 It is this clear understanding of that hypocrisy which enabled The Windrush Generation, and fellow early ethnic minority communities, to dismiss that institutional, systemic, racist, embedded colonial mindset completely, while simultaneously moving forward with a clear vision of their objectives, and to achieve them successfully.

It is the scaremongering of those in the past, and is still continuing now by those in the present, which has set the stage for where Britain is today - divisive and contentious on the issue of race and disparities. Refusal to grapple with a wilful and determined intent to keep immigrants and their descendants underfoot, will be chief in maintaining the divisions and conflict on race relations in Britain for decades to come.

Knowing full well that the above, from the beginning to this point, will be totally and vehemently refuted and rejected by its detractors, will be of no significance whatsoever in dealing with the issue of race, and ethnic disparities in Britain. It will  only prolong the fight for racial justice, and equality, in opposition to those who intend to maintain what is uncomfortable. 

Nevertheless, I trust it will garner some positive attention.

On a lighter note, I applaud Dr. Sewell, Chair of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, and give my full support on his insight, and suggestion, to "disaggregate the term BAME" according to the recommendation outlined. In my opinion, the bundling of ethnic minority groups together as if exempt from any kind of identity and uniqueness, and where only the collection of specific analytical data that is of bureaucratic importance is a priority, does nothing to discover the qualities and potential of each specific group to contribute to the betterment of Britain. It is irrelevant collective terms such as 'BAME', that increases the resentment felt by ethnic minorities towards the British Establishment. To explain my point, I am black, born in Britain of Jamaican stock (note the heritage), with a very small percentage of Indian mix descended from my parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents. This differentiates me from another individual who is black, British, and Jamaican by birth or descent, from one who is black, British, and of another Caribbean nationality by birth or descent, and furthermore from one who is black, British, and African by birth or descent. Even our British Asian brothers and sisters are fully aware of the unique differences between their British Caribbean brothers and sisters, and themselves. I think I have enough intelligence to know that not every person in Britain who is of a white complexion, regardless of difference in hair colour and colour of eyes, is English and Anglo Saxon! At this point, I have to smile, as I remember reading of an experience at a university in England, where it was stated that there are those who still find it difficult to see, tell, or hear the difference between one black person and another in the 21st century. 

Can you imagine?

I wonder why ethnic minorities on a whole do not have that problem in identifying the difference between their white brothers and sisters?

Food for thought eh?

With the greatest of respect to The Chair, and the Commission for their hard work in compiling The Report, the bottom line is, change on race and ethnic disparities, is about change in the mindset, and attitude, towards other ethnic groups, nationalities, and social class. The pitiful display of 'sorry', and 'apologies' for slavery, and Britain's colonial past, and the fake changes in terms of the so-called 'inclusion' of ethnic minorities that is going on since the protests of the Black Lives Matter Movement, will do absolutely nothing to resolve that intrinsic mindset, and existing negative attitudes towards ethnic minorities. That mindset will continue to be a perpetual stumbling block to Britain's progress since the fall of The British Empire. 

In a post-Brexit Britain, to move forward, all hands on deck will be required. This will be of significant importance as each remaining member island state, or country of The Commonwealth, slowly, but surely, and gradually, considers the move to becoming a republic. Without the fallback of The Empire, partnership with the European Union, and change, real effective racial and social change, I believe the future will be both interesting, and challenging, in the former Motherland.

I wish to remember the late Sir William Macpherson of Cluny who fearlessly called out 'institutional racism'. 

I refer to the term in the general sense.

It is still there. The battle continues.

However, with all of its disadvantages, racism will never cease to be the strength, vehicle, and driving force, in the continuing, and sustained success of people of colour in Britain. No matter what attempts are made to belittle them, regardless of the disparities created to stall their advancement, earning power, legally gainful activities, to cause them to be ineffective in their endeavours, or even to restrict their physical number - the mindset will always focus on success.

The greater the racism, in fact, with or without racism, the higher ethnic minorities rise.

The Windrush Generation Monument at Waterloo Station is a treasure to behold. The family climbing the suitcases is highly significant of how The Windrush Generation climbed up out of nothing to build their lives in The Motherland, while forged together by their unity, strength of family, and general culture as a people.

That unyielding spirit of The Windrush Generation, ethnic  minorities in general, and their descendants born in the U.K., or not, Britain will never break.

It is unfortunate the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report, omitted to record that fact.

Finally, as you may be aware, I speak of my parents often in my posts. They were instrumental in imparting to me their Jamaican culture, Jamaican Creole, how to enable both to live in harmony with the British way of life, and more importantly, conveyed to me very significant guidelines which have helped me in making choice, and personal decisions. 

My father said, quite often, and in effect, be careful of the offers, requests, and opportunities put to you. If you do decide to consider, or accept, do so taking into account all aspects presented, including the possibility of a hidden agenda. 

He also implied, watch the smiles, be wary of the gifts, focus on the positive and negative of the objective, because where an 'Uncle Tom' can be found...

Otherwise, if one does not proceed with caution, there is the possibility, one may end up on one's face, in it.

Be good.

Love, blessings, and peace.

Grace

The Interview

Greetings,

The interview of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, with Oprah Winfrey, was a sad day. It brought to the surface controversy that would rather have remained hidden. The reality, is that the revelations are not going to alter, nor change, in any form, the deep rooted idiosyncrasies that exist, nor help to resolve long-standing discontent on some controversial issues that have existed for centuries in the North Atlantic. The publicity veneer, following the interview, makes this no less a fact.                 

Yet, we can learn from it. 

Social class and elevated position, has nothing to  do with aspects of what was said in the interview. The issues, in a variety of ways, are very pervasive, and requires a learned approach in order to survive, thrive, and avert, it's emotional and psychological effect. 

Escaping the lions den is one thing. How to escape it intermittently, continuously, or permanently is another. It is not wise, in my opinion, to do battle across The Atlantic unless one is versed in diplomatic, intellectual, and psychological warfare, which is not necessarily a skilled art in that part of  the world. Although painful, it is more productive to enter a battle in known, or even unknown terrritory.  At least try to navigate through it, strategically. Several battles may have to be won, but still the war will not be over. One has to endure. Running away from the 'battle front' without confronting the issue(s) according to the principles of psychological warfare and diplomacy prevalent in a particular territory, is counterproductive. Who knows if such experiences would better prepare for what else could be in store? It is the 'battle scars', victories, and triumphs, that define, and refine character, to eventually win the day. There are many who can attest to challenges and conflict fought with a strategy in hand, while refusing, under any circumstances, to be defeated.

It appears that either not much, nor any research was done, to find out what one was getting in to. If so, that was not a good idea. Even if it was not considered necessary, it would have been a sensible and useful move. There seems to have been an absence of any thought towards the mindset of others outside of one's own home country. This is a global space. It is not about a 'just me' situation. To save your own sanity it is important to think outside of your comfort zone for self-preservation. The saying "Forewarned is forearmed", should not be taken lightly, especially when the odds are likely not to be in your favour.

With regard to the skin colour furore, I will try not to waste much time on the blatantly obvious. Whether true or not, which makes no difference, this is the real world. There is a need to get over the 'shock' revelation, which in  fact is no shock at all. As far as I am concerned, it would take a complete fool not to expect such a thought to arise amongst the higher echelons of power. History will not leave us alone. To expect the unexpected should not have been a surprise. Bear in mind, if this revolving door should come around again, it may be necessary to deal with it head on. For me, what is really annoying about the exit, is that being on a very significant platform, and in effect, representing a section of society that has to deal with issues on interracial relationships/marriages, there was the opportunity to take the initiative and lead the narrative to help educate, what is still a tunnel vision society, on that score.

There are some old wise Jamaican sayings learnt from my Jamaican parents, which have helped to guide my life, as to how to proceed with caution with who I meet, and to be observant of their behaviour, be it direct or indirect, and of others around them who may or may not be of significance to note. Two of them I will highlight here, The second saying, my late mother reminded me of constantly while growing up in England. I will try to the best of my ability, to convey the sayings correctly, Jamaican style, (not in true Jamaican Creole), and in English. I apologise for any errors I make.  

Jamaican Style: "See me, an come live wid me, a two different ting"

In English: "To know me, and then come and live with me, are two entirely different experiences"

Jamaican Style: "Not every truth is to be made known"

In English: " Not everything should be brought out in the open"

What I am trying to get across, is that one cannot assume all will be well in uncharted waters, no matter how wonderful it looks. Wisdom has to be the principle to guide in uncertain, difficult or troubled times.

We can all choose where we want to call home. It depends on how, why, and sometimes the ties that bind that determine the choice.

Nevertheless, wherever we go, whatever we do, in the midst of challenge and conflict, there is no time to waste, no time to listen to hearsay, no time to bicker, no time to deal with accusations, no time to falter, no time to doubt, and certainly no time to fear.

In the midst of the mess, make time to fix what is uncomfortable. Make peace, and make time to rise up, and move forward, one day at a time.

I wish Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and their son, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, every blessing, and every success.

Peace

Grace

Black Lives Don't Matter - National Museums Liverpool (NML)

Greetings,

It was with great interest I read an article on concerns raised  regarding issues black curators have, or may not have, on dealing with artefacts that may be disturbing to work with in terms of the racist implications behind the usage in times past.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/08/01/black-staff-offered-counselling-curating-difficult-slavery-museum/

Furthermore,  as it is assumed that the black curators may experience emotional trauma, that they be offered access to "help" to deal with "difficult content",  with the provision of mental health support, and of "safe spaces" for black curators to 'escape' the stress of such racist historical content, it appears this is a subject worthy of further discussion.

It is well known amongst the black community within the U.K. that the subject of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, how slaves were brutally treated, the controversial  methods used to restrain, constrain, and punish the slaves in to submission, never ceases to raise emotional feelings of anger, and fuel heated discussion. To suggest that black curators working with historically racist artefacts may experience a negative effect on their mental health, and therefore will be offered help where necessary, is very uncomfortable reading indeed. 

What evidence is there to sustain this view?  Personally, I would prefer the black curators to state their own concerns publicly, if such concerns exist. 

For those who may not be aware, black curators are not exclusive to the National Museums Liverpool. Caribbean curators are also within The  Caribbean Region pursuing their research and/or recording artefacts on that highly contentious and controversial period of Caribbean History. Each find, and discovery of knowledge, strengthens the resolve to heighten research efforts to piece together its 'buried' history,  and that of its slave ancestors. Apart from the typical human feelings of tiredness and occasional stress that all we humans experience from time to time, to date I have not heard of any issues regarding the mental health of researchers/curators in the field of African and Caribbean History at universities and museums within The Caribbean Region. I am willing to be corrected.

I would have thought that black curators, at a museum within the U.K., given the opportunity to be at the helm of working with artefacts which are significant in the history of their people, would place them in the ideal position to learn extensively and enthusiastically of the past, and build a picture of the horrors of slavery not only for the Black African/Caribbean Community's educational benefit, but for everyone's learning and interest.

I will set aside the Black Lives Matter Movement, for the moment, which in my opinion, is being used as a cover for this extraordinary assumption. Unless there are other underlying reasons to give validity to the issue that black curators may require "help" in the provision of mental health support, and "safe spaces", and these  be offered should the need arise, in order to cope with the positives and negatives of their work,  I will treat that assumption with extreme scepticism.

Peace

Grace

Black Lives Don't Matter - The Robert Milligan statue

Greetings,

The applause was premature on the removal of the Robert Milligan statue. Why? The statue of Robert Milligan was not removed to pacify protesters of the Black Lives Matter Movement per se regardless of what statement was released. It was a question of preserving the statue, and to save it from potential damage and/or destruction as seen during events that took place with the Edward Colston statue in Bristol.

In the year of his death, in 1809, Robert Milligan, a Scottish merchant, owned 526 slaves in Jamaica who worked on his sugar plantations at Kellet's, and at Mammee Gully both of which were in the parish of Clarendon, Jamaica.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Milligan_(Merchant)

Apart from Robert Milligan being a slave owner in his lifetime, there is much history we can learn of his exploits in the West Indies, but most of all how he played an integral role in the construction of the West India Dock, in London. I am not trying to be a killjoy here, but I tend to look beyond the front page for 'the reasons why' certain happenings took place in the past.

Slavery and British Imperial History is galling to say the least. Yet in the midst of it all, descendants of slaves need to look beyond the surface, and the historical emotional upheaval of the past offences towards our ancestors, to recognise our ancestral connection between events of that period of history, more recent history, and Britain's monuments and statues celebrated within the U.K. Remember, as ethnic minorities we have our heroes/heroines too who were in the U.K, made their contribution, and/or studied in the U.K. while enduring rejection, for example, Mahatma Ghandi (India), Mary Seacole (Jamaica).

There is much history that West Indians in the U.K. and their descendants are not privy to regarding historical documentations of The British Empire. The monuments and statues of statesmen, stateswomen, slaveowners, politicians who may have played a part in Britain's Imperial History, or other aspects of British History which has had an impact in Black Caribbean History, and Black African History, should be researched and connections made to give our history more clarity and depth. Our descendants that follow need to have a clearer understanding of who they are as a people, and will be able to defend their race, history, and cultures with unbridled knowledge, rather that with radical acts which are fleeting and accomplish nothing to move our people forward.

The British born ethnic minority will never be English Anglo Saxons,  or any other indigenous descendant within the United Kingdom. Therefore, it is imperative, that our genealogical ancestry, and historical knowledge is known, and passed on to future generations in order for them to negotiate the race relations obstacles that will continuously be a part of their lives, as well as adaptation to the English way of life. Stability is created by knowing who you are, and where you stand, regardless of the opposition. It is worthy to note that these were the values that The Windrush Generation upheld and lived by. With all of their trials in England, there were many times they were up against it, put down, racially abused, humiliated, made to feel that they were uneducated, lacking in intelligence, and even suffered the loss of some of their compatriots under questionable circumstances. Nevertheless, in the face of overt and covert hostilities, they never allowed neither themselves, nor anyone else, to place them in a 'subject' and 'inferior' position which was always interpreted by the 'wise and prudent' as insubordination, or/and "having a chip on one's shoulder". Holding one's position, with respect, was the forte of The Windrush Generation. They had seen and experienced much nonsense on having the British settlers on their respective islands during Crown Colony, many of whom were of the upper class. So it was somewhat of a surprise on arrival in England to find that Crown Colony was not a true reflection of the Motherland.

Within Jamaica, and other West Indian islands, there are still relics, symbols, burial sites in and outside of churches, and  school names, and even the personal surnames of Caribbean people etc. that remind the West Indies of its strong link with slavery, the imperial, and colonial past of Britain. Nevertheless, out of that abyss, The Caribbean Region has, and is still resurrecting its history, identity, culture, and original relationship with its true Motherland, Africa, to uncover its buried history, not of its own making, and continue to build a new narrative.

The Black British Caribbean Community need to follow-up the history of Robert Milligan and the role he played in the planning, and financing of the West India Dock. It must be remembered that Jamaican, and no doubt, other West Indian produce and resources flooded the British market during that time, of which the West India Dock played a part, and the natural resources of the West Indies in many instances were used to manufacture goods in Britain which were then imported into West Indian islands, which the indigenous West Indian people could not afford, but the British settlers could. My parents remember well this aspect of their homeland's history during their experiences of Crown Colony. Profitable Indigenous entrepreneurship was not encouraged - a polite way of putting it.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_India_Docks

I do not support the wanton destruction of statues within the U.K., representing stalwarts of the past, with a questionable link to slavery. It is counterproductive, and achieves nothing, especially when it brings about a retaliation by destroying statues which are not indigenous to the home nation, for example, the Haile Selassie bust at Cannizaro Park, Wimbledon, London.

What is needed is a change of mindset.

The Black British Caribbean Community need to ensure that they, and their children, and grandchildren, take the opportunity to visit places of public interest which will give them access to British Imperial History, and in general the History of Britain. This research should be in conjunction with research on Britain's colonial history in the West Indies in its entirety and not just focus on slavery. In addition, it is important to read books on all of the above, including works by West Indian writers, academic and non-academic on colonialism and imperialism from a Caribbean perspective, and visit monuments and structures within the U.K. which will help to give a clearer picture of the connection between Britain, its history, and The British Empire.

I invite the indigenous people of the United Kingdom to research their Imperial and colonial history from the West Indian perspective.

I am well aware that this post may engender much consternation on both sides of the racial divide.

That is a minor detail as far as I am concerned.

The greater issue is that a battle cannot be fought continuously with the same mundane strategies, and 'ancient weapons', then expect to achieve a different result.

I headed up this, and previous posts, "Black Lives Don't Matter".

The question is to such a statement - why?

 In my view, this is where the conversation, and  discussion, begins.

What we need is an open understanding of the innate racism that lies within each of us, and why, no matter how minor or dormant.

To achieve that understanding, and to move forward, we need to understand each other, and more importantly, our histories, and how it impacts the present, and how it will affect the way forward.

We all have the opportunity to gain that understanding.


Peace

Grace

Black Lives Don't Matter - The Rhodes Must Fall Campaign

Greetings,

Before I begin this post in earnest, I am well aware of the uproar it may bring. I am not perturbed in the slightest, because I do not believe a 'fight' should be taken on which does not make sense.

The Rhodes Must Fall Campaign by students at the University of Oxford is, no doubt, well intentioned.

Whether the University of Oxford agrees or not to the demands of the Rhodes Must Fall Campaign, I can assure you that the history of Cecil Rhodes will remain entrenched within the annals of Oriel College, and within the University itself.

As for the demands made to the University of Oxford administration by the Campaign to include removal of the offending statue and other articles, to make official, public, and permanent acknowledgements of colonial violence, full apologies for this, commitments to that, the establishment of whatever else with deadlines - I will leave all that right where it is. No matter what the University of Oxford administration says in response to the demands by the Rhodes Must Fall Campaign, the colonial, imperial, and exploitive past of Britain's history is the bedrock upon which the University is built.

Decolonising curriculum at the University ( which is another issue) is equivalent to decolonising the endemic racist and colonial mentality of Britain. Unless the Rhodes Must Fall Campaign is planning to step up its objective to advocate for the rebuilding and re-education of Britain to reflect an evenly balanced history for all, it is my view, the Campaign needs to take a step back to get a clear picture of what it is about. If change does happen in places, it will be for show, ineffective, and will make no difference to what exists now. Britain will not allow a cultural assault, be it educational or otherwise, on its own turf.

With that said, the enormous cultural  and economic assault on the African subcontinent by Britain and Europe, is still not understood, or more so, conveniently ignored by the intelligentsia, and indigenous blinkered citizens within British society. This should not be a forced issue, nor by demand. Both sides know what the issue(s) of contention are, and would be wise to work together to bring about a reconciliation of Imperial history.

The glorification of The British Empire, and reverence held for past British patriots of that era with questionable endeavours, deliberately blanks out African, Caribbean, Indian history respectively, and all placed under the shadow of The British Empire. Its stubborn resistance towards African history, by segregating it, dismissing it as irrelevant and non-existent, is descriptive of how black lives matter only in monetary terms, but not on an intellectual level. Today Black lives still don't matter, unless there is a specific purpose, or some usefulness which is not in the interest of the black man and woman.

The University of Oxford does not want to soil it's hands with Britain's corrupt colonial history. The same will apply to other British universities even if they agree to make gradual changes in specific curriculum, or with whatever else may arise.

Call me what you will. The truth needs to be told. However, I am aware that a person of my ethnic origin making such pronouncements will cause some readers of this post to feel very uncomfortable. So be it.

Furthermore, the Rhodes Must Fall Campaign needs to reconsider it's position.

This Campaign is doing nothing that is in accordance with The Black Lives Matter Movement. In my view it is doing the opposite very successfully. By the Campaign taking its chosen position,  it is, unintentionally, reinforcing the position of the University of Oxford to retain its founders, benefactors, and the cultural heritage of the University which will always take precedence over anything that comes up against it. This is why I have headed this post 'Black Lives Don't Matter' because the Campaign's action on this issue translates to just that.

What about the perpetual disproportionate number of black boys, and black men, who are subjected to Stop and Search? What about the disproportionate number of black men incarcerated in British prisons? What about the disproportionate number of black men who die while in police custody? What about the black men, and black women, who are murdered because of their colour? What about the disproportionate number of black boys, who are excluded from high school and their future blighted?  This is where effective change needs to take place, and where the emphasis of a campaign should be - to bring an end to the presumptuous mission to destroy the lives of our black children, black men, and black women.

Slavery and colonialism could have wiped out the black race, but it failed. However, look at what is happening now, and the Rhodes Must Fall Campaign is wasting time on superfluous nonsense.


I was born and raised in Britain. My parents were immigrants to Britain from Jamaica. I've seen racial conflict in Britain, and my parents have seen and lived the colonial, imperial, and exploitation of their island Jamaica under British colonial rule. However, one thing was, and is still sure. Neither my parents nor I were interested in changing Britain's landscape, nor its institutions. It was more important to us to never allow the imperial, colonial, racial prejudice, and false sense of superiority mindset of some of its indigenous people to psychologically undermine us as black people in any form, or any manner, whatsoever.

The late Cecil Rhodes is a part of British Imperial history. Demanding the removal of his statue will not change the past, neither will it help ethnic minorities overcome any race relations difficulties experienced, nor effectively change any position on The British Empire, slavery, imperialism and Colonalism at the University of Oxford. As regurgitating as it is to face that fact, this is the reality. Nevertheless, we can revisit the history of our people, dig it out and put it on display because the intelligentsia, and the ignorant among us, believe black people have no history. Their position is understandable as our history was swept under the carpet, or in some cases buried,  to give way for the European sanctified version which our people have been subjected to through teaching in the former Crown Colonies, and within Britain. We need to rise above the exploitation, colonialism, and imperialism experienced by our forefathers, and everything else associated with it. Build past it, build our history, be innovative, and move forward for real change.

Leave the University of Oxford to decide its own future. Removing the statue of Cecil Rhodes or any other controversial statue will not effect any constructive change for ethnic minorities at the University of Oxford, and within Britain, now nor in the future. Where there is no will to bring about real, effective, change, the situation will remain the same.

In the meantime, there are more constructive matters to be dealt with.

Peace

Grace